In article <199805271801.LAA16729@lestat.nas.nasa.gov>,
Jason Thorpe  <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov> wrote:
> I agree with you, and like the:
> 
> 	sys/arch/powerpc -> sys/arch/ofppc
> 
> 	new sys/arch/powerpc with PowerPC-generic stuff

I thought the sys/cpu/{mips,powerpc,m68k} approach was preffered last
time this came up? I preffered that one, myself. Apparently it has gone
out of favor again?