[ On , July 10, 2001 at 01:20:30 (+0100), Iggy Drougge wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Netscape or Mosaic?
>
> Oh, but HTML 3.0 is a very different kettle of fish. HTML 3.0 was what the W3C
> wanted, HTML 3.2 is mainly a formalised version of Netscape's proprietary
> HTML.

well, what do I know?  :-0

I barely know how to write tables in HTML (even though (I was once an
expert in 'tbl').

> Is it nice to use?

It works OK -- the only trick is remembering to double-click to follow a link.

> Has it yet gained support for inline JPEGs, or PNGs for that matter?

Oh, yes, of course!

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>     <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>;   Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>