Subject: ibus addresses [was Re: CVS commit: syssrc]
To: None <thorpej@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@NetBSD.ORG>
List: port-pmax
Date: 11/24/1999 09:49:43
Jason R Thorpe wrote:
>
> Module Name: syssrc
> Committed By: thorpej
> Date: Tue Nov 23 20:07:41 UTC 1999
>
> Modified Files:
>
> syssrc/sys/arch/pmax/conf: files.pmax
> syssrc/sys/arch/pmax/ibus: ibus.c ibusvar.h
>
> Log Message:
>
> Add an `addr' locator to the `ibus' bus. This allows you to wire down
> unti numbers on systems which have e.g. multiple `dc' devices on the
> internal bus (like the 5100).
I'm curious about what this gains. The 5100 only has a single `dc'...
The autoconf output now has the addresses (which is nicer) but you also
see a "pm ... not configured", which a 5100 can't have. Here's the old:
ibus0 at mainbus0
dc0 at ibus0
le0 at ibus0: address 08:00:2b:25:28:fc
le0: 32 receive buffers, 8 transmit buffers
le0: supplying EUI64: 08:00:2b:ff:fe:25:28:fc
sii0 at ibus0: target 7
mcclock0 at ibus0: mc146818 or compatible
and the new:
ibus0 at mainbus0
pm at ibus0 addr 0xfc00000 not configured
dc0 at ibus0 addr 0x1c000000
le0 at ibus0 addr 0x18000000: address 08:00:2b:25:28:fc
le0: 32 receive buffers, 8 transmit buffers
le0: supplying EUI64: 08:00:2b:ff:fe:25:28:fc
sii0 at ibus0 addr 0x1a000000: target 7
mcclock0 at ibus0 addr 0x1d000000: mc146818 or compatible
Is there a way not to be verbose about devices that aren't attached?
Simon.