Subject: Re: update(2): Re: netboot on 5000/240 probs
To: Toru Nishimura <nisimura@itc.aist-nara.ac.jp>
From: Michael Bartosh <bartosh@apple.tamu.edu>
List: port-pmax
Date: 10/26/1999 21:31:34
At 10:09 AM +0900 10/27/99, Toru Nishimura wrote:
> > OK at this point I have gotten the machine to swallow both nfsnetbsd
> > and smallnet.ecoff-
> >
> > There are hundreds of lines of:
> > ?IO: LANCE ste 0xa6b3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > ?IO: LANCE ste 0xa6b3
> > \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> > ?IO: LANCE ste 0xa6b3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> > | | | | | | | |
> > ?IO: LANCE ste 0xa6b3
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ?IO: LANCE ste 0xa6b3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>LANCE status register complains there were network transaction error
>which should not have happen in correctly configured Ethernet network.
?I have a simple dumb hub behind a MASQing linux box- a 192.168.1.x
subnet. On the hub there is a NeXT, an iMac, a PowerBook 2400 and a
NetBSD Mac68k Quadra. All other...
Ahh! If all other hosts respond correctly it must be the transciever-
and was :-) (turned heartbeat on)
However then I'm stuck at
>>boot 3/tftp
-tftp boot(3) , bootp 192.168.1.1:/tftpboot/smallnet.ecoff
^Cftp load 437376
and
>>boot 3/tftp
-tftp boot(3) , bootp 192.168.1.1:/tftpboot/nfsnetbsd
^Cftp load 954672/
Then the spinning cursor stops and there's no more network activity-
so netbooting yet for me. Ideas???
-mab
>
> > Repeated many times. I am supposing that it's waiting for the NFS
> > stuff that I have not had time to look at. I put it off when I saw
> > that I did not understand Linux's new NFS implementation without some
> > research.
>
>The messages are generated by LANCE network driver built in DECstation
>PROM monitor. At this point NetBSD kernel is not active yet, so Linux
>NFS server implementation is not related with this errorous behavior.
>
>Tohru Nishimura