Subject: Re: Current PMAX 5000/200 SCSI oddity
To: Michael L. Hitch <mhitch@lightning.oscs.montana.edu>
From: Greg Wohletz <greg@duke.CS.UNLV.EDU>
List: port-pmax
Date: 12/21/1998 14:41:19
>On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, Andreas Priebe wrote:
>
>> I know this is a real old story, which I hoped is resolved now -
>> especially after reading the relaese notes of current 1.3.x releases.
>> So I went along and built a kernel from current as of 19.12.
>>
>> But alas...
>>
>> Already during boot it gave me lots of the wellknown
>>
>> asc_get_status cmdreg 11 fifo count 6 (or 7 or 3)
>> or
>> rz0 Illegal request
>> rz1 Illegal request
>> or
>> SENSE
>>
>> and dumped so much core files that I changed back imediately to my
>> (relatively) stable kernel from -current as of March 98.
>>
>> Any ideas what I am doing wrong ... ???
>
> These would appear to be some of the problems documented in PR#5510,
>which is partially fixed in -current and 1.3.3. I was able to duplicate
>some of the problems that Greg Wohletz reported in that PR, and fix or
>work around them, but Greg was still having problems that I was not
>able to duplicate on my system and was not able to come up with anything
>for Greg to try that would help me understand where the problem was. My
>guess is that it depends upong the SCSI devices attached to the system,
>and the devices I have don't exhibit that problem.
>
> Until I can get a device configuration that has the same problem, this
>is probably not likely to get fixed soon. [Also, when the pmax finally
>gets switched to the MI ncr53c9x driver, the problem may disappear.]
>
>Michael
>
I've been able to eliminate the probalem on my 200s by using an old version
of the driver (1.2F i believe). I can provide the replacement code to
anyone who is interested.
Using this driver I have one 5000/200 acting as a squid proxy for several
thousand users, and another acting as an NNTP server, both are performing
well under this rather heavy load.
--Greg