I just tested the smallest apps of all...

--------main.cpp---------
void main(void) {}
-------end-------------------
g++ -o t1 main.cpp

This gives the problems with the "undefined references to t*"

Add -ltermcap to the commandline (g++ -o t1 main.cpp -ltermcap)

Then run ./t1

-> sigsegv.

Harald.


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Simon Burge [SMTP:simonb@telstra.com.au]
> Sent:	13. august 1998 00:29
> To:	Harald Bjoroy
> Cc:	'port-pmax@netbsd.org'
> Subject:	Re: C++ compiler wackyness. 
> 
> On Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:19:05 +0200  Harald Bjoroy wrote:
> 
> > You are quite right!
> > 
> > I tried a very small test app "mytest.cpp", which defined a class,
> then
> > used it.
> > 
> > Straight to segmentation fault.
> > 
> > This test is so small that it can't contain errors, also it builds &
> > runs immidiately on my i486.
> > 
> > Maybe the compiler must be rebuilt? It would seem like the ++
> libraries
> > are bad?
> > 
> > Would a newer compiler build? (are the compilers implemented without
> the
> > use of c++?)
> > 
> > 
> > The kernelbuild use no cpp, and that must also be true for the other
> > packages leading up to compiling moc too. Moc is using c++.
> > 
> > I'll stay tuned!
> 
> Isn't some of the groff stuff c++?  The files end in .cc and the
> contents look sortof funny ;)
> 
> I've got a reasonable -current-ish system.  Given that I've never ever
> even really looked at a c++ program let alone written one, can you
> send
> me your little test program and I'll try it out on this machine.
> 
> Simon.