Subject: Re: Problems booting new 1.3 kernel
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Yiorgos Adamopoulos <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/21/1998 02:16:19
On Tue, Jan 20, 1998 at 04:08:11PM -0800, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> But why a 2.88 floppy instead of 1.44, then? Do the 2.88 drives
Just next door, there exists a DEC 486 Novell Server with a 2.88 drive. I
suppose DEC wanted to push forward 2.88 drive use.
> reliably write data that's readable by a 1.44 drive?
>From what people next door tell me, it works reliably. In fact they only use
it for 1.44 disks.