Subject: Re: Problems booting new 1.3 kernel
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Yiorgos Adamopoulos <>
List: port-pmax
Date: 01/21/1998 02:16:19
On Tue, Jan 20, 1998 at 04:08:11PM -0800, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> But why a 2.88 floppy instead of 1.44, then?  Do the 2.88 drives

Just next door, there exists a DEC 486 Novell Server with a 2.88 drive.  I
suppose DEC wanted to push forward 2.88 drive use.

> reliably write data that's readable by a 1.44 drive?

>From what people next door tell me, it works reliably.  In fact they only use
it for 1.44 disks.