On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 09:59:29 -0400 (EDT)  Leo Bicknell wrote:

> > You must have done something wrong.  On a system withe the most recent
> > snapshot freshly unpacked, I got:
> 
> 	I think I opened a can of worms. :-)
> 
> 	I looked around some more, I'd say all of my groups
> are completely messed up.  I then looked at the /etc/group
> on my miniroot and the one that ended up in /etc (from base.tar).
> They are different. :-(  You'll see them attached to the bottom
> of this message.

Does your base.tar contain a /etc/group?  The etc.tar.gz from 1.2
contains a correct /etc/group, but I've never looked at the miniroot.

> 	So, what's the right version of /etc/group? :-)
> 
> (FWIW: Most of /bin is group tty, which is 4, which on the
>        miniroot /etc/group would be bin, which sounds right.)
> 
> 
> /etc/group from a 1.2 miniroot:
> system:*:0:
> daemon:*:1:
> uucp:*:2:
> kmem:*:3:
> bin:*:4:
> news:*:8:
> staff:*:10:
> operator:*:28:
> 
> /etc/group from the latest snapshot:
> wheel:*:0:root,bicknell
> daemon:*:1:daemon
> kmem:*:2:root
> sys:*:3:root
> tty:*:4:root
> operator:*:5:root
> bin:*:7:
> news:*:8:
> wsrc:*:9:
> games:*:13:
> users:*:15:
> staff:*:20:root
> guest:*:31:root
> nobody:*:39:
> utmp:*:45:
> ingres:*:74:ingres
> dialer:*:117:
> nogroup:*:32766:

This one agrees with /usr/etc/etc/group and the /etc/group from the 1.2
etc.tar.gz, and is the same as my /etc/group (sans local changes).

Simon.