On Jul  7, 12:26am, Jonathan Stone wrote:
>  >PROM info       who     what
>  >-------------   ---     ----------------------------------------------
> 
>  >KN02-BA v2.1k   js      Does not TFTPboot stripped ECOFF files
>  >KN02-CA v2.0m   js      Does not TFTPboot stripped ECOFF files
> 
> But these two should read:
> 
> KN02-BA v2.1k   js      No known problems TFTP booting as of NetBSD 1.2G,
> 			(don't tftpboot with kernels made by old elf2ecoff)
> KN02-CA v2.0m   js      No known problems TFTP booting as of NetBSD 1.2G,
> 			(don't tftpboot with kernels made by old elf2ecoff)

  My 5000/25 report "KN02-CA V2.0g";  I haven't tested tftp booting yet.

> We should list a 5000/50 somewhere as "KN04 v2.0m", I htink that's
> what Michael Hitch has.  If you're going to list a KN02 as KN02-AA,
> I'd list the kn04 as KN04-BA and KN04-CA, just to avoid confusion.

  My 5000/50 reports "KN04 V2.1k";  again, I haven't tested tftp booting.

Michael

-- 
Michael L. Hitch			mhitch@montana.edu
Computer Consultant
Information Technology Center
Montana State University	Bozeman, MT	USA