On Jun 14,  4:15pm, Simon Burge wrote:
> Is there any news on the r4k support?  I just noticed a PR from Michael
> from an r4k machine, but other than that things have been a bit quiet.
> Would it be a good guess that all work to date has been with the R4000,
> and not the R4400?

  My work has been done on an R4000 (5000/50), but I have someone who has
just recently verified that I now appear to have the R4400 support working.
I've waiting for verification of some changes I've made that affect the
R4400, since I had some problems getting the R4000 working with those
changes as well.

  I am getting very close to being ready to commit the r4k support that I
currently have.  The initial r4k support only allows building a kernel for
the R2000/R3000 or R4000/R4400.  The next step will be changing things so
that a single kernel will support both.  I'm trying to be fairly certain
that I haven't broken the R2000/R3000 before I commit my changes.

Michael

-- 
Michael L. Hitch			mhitch@montana.edu
Computer Consultant
Information Technology Center
Montana State University	Bozeman, MT	USA