Subject: Re: MVME167A, NBSD1.4(patched), rock-solid xdm
To: Steve Woodford <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 09/21/1999 12:32:47
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 19:41:36 +0100 (BST)
Steve Woodford <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It seems someone beat me to it. Looking at mvme68k's machdep.c, it already
> has two segments, 0==onboard memory, 1==VMEbus memory. Would I be right to
> assume UVM treats segment 0 as higher priority than segment 1?
Yup, cool. I guess I must have done that when I added the support to UVM
in the first place.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>