Subject: Re: 64-bit paddr_t (again, arrgh....)
To: Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
From: Garrett D'Amore <garrett_damore@tadpole.com>
List: port-mips
Date: 01/30/2006 16:00:57
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simon Burge wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:39:34PM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
>
>>> So can I take this as approval to go ahead and make that
>>> change, so that paddr_t is 64-bits on all evbmips?
>> Yes.
>
> Same here.  If you can do some simple before-and-after benchmarks
> too that'd be nice, but not necessary.
I've not generated the benchmarks yet, but the commit is done.
>
> Simon. -- Simon Burge
> <simonb@wasabisystems.com> NetBSD Development, Support and Service:
> http://www.wasabisystems.com/


- --
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/
Phone: 951 325-2134  Fax: 951 325-2191
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBQ96ouf49Sp1nAoU7AQIT3AgApKR1IQ5Mo82q6kCvMW9NXsrncAn95RHb
8u0JN28OnkOcXlgyPTbRyOXTNHbIzbjpsz/PdSmtsttLVnilAhpDI7+FTHoYmcO6
AAb3Hm6NqtplQreo4GHvreaKKngV4smfAAMsCr0VAazQfjpV6RzOSX3J9IKo4h6v
+9HO0mui3TyEdl/du6d+AL4nnGJYvDA3xOQGYYcgc5ZW1gdYkKaJXnTNbohCnB0+
Kl0yu9ZGPBsS6paOopCjXFzKUnDhANFoPKqWldTYqZ4TccWgrRz7fQOnWem2tebn
xIVOl6xIYRNzw9IdH/3No+It6Gs7u4n8DsNdMAaHZ9dqit/7kFi7dQ==
=/3iP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----