Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> As Izumi-san recently pointed out, there is a problem with my current approach 
> of conditionalizing the size of paddr_t on 64-bit platforms.  The problem is 
> that LKMs are likely to be impacted.  (Most of the userland tools work fine, 
> which was my original concern.)
> 
> I would like to reach a decision on this as soon as possible.  My preference 
> is to just change the paddr_t size across the entire evbmips port.

does evbmips encompass any non-R4k processors?
-- 
Matt Thomas                     email: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry              www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA              disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.