Subject: Re: replace pa_to_pvh() and pa_to_attribute() macro
To: None <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
List: port-mips
Date: 11/23/2005 13:21:41
In article <20051123003612.GA3048@thoreau.thistledown.com.au>
simonb@wasabisystems.com wrote:

> I meant "does inlining the pa_to_pvh() and pa_to_attribute() functions
> give a performance hit or boost over not inlining?"

Well, my proposal is to change macro to inline functions,
so I guess it gives few performance hit. Un-inlining may
shows some difference, but we can always specify gcc -fno-inline
on "smaller is better" situations even if __inline is specified :-)
---
Izumi Tsutsui