Subject: Re: VM change for R4000
To: None <port-mips@netbsd.org>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
List: port-mips
Date: 03/13/2005 12:40:12
In article <d70571f48b4c0616cfa99445c425560f@3am-software.com>
matt@3am-software.com wrote:

> I have felt for a long time, that when mmap chooses a dynamic address 
> for a
> vnode, it should use an existing mapped adress for that vnode, or 
> choose a
> new address that has no other vnode mapped as text.

Choosing a new address doesn't help for virtual aliases on VIPT cache,
I think. What we have to do is to choose an address which have
the same VA index with existing mapped one, isn't it?
---
Izumi Tsutsui