Subject: Re: Wscons. Any substitute?
To: Vieri Verze <vieri.v@gmail.com>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: port-macppc
Date: 12/05/2005 18:50:41
--Signature_Mon__5_Dec_2005_18_50_41_-0500_GtWyqvpAEN63Y6PL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

> > draw the console which is slow. Currently there's
> > no official way to use a different driver. If you
> > have a mach64-based graphics chip ( which doesn't
> > happen to be a Rage LT ) you can apply some
>=20
> This is very interesting! :-)
> But I have a Lombard PB and it has a Ati Rage 128 Lt Pro. Even if
> driver are the same I don't think it will work.

Sorry, the Rage 128 is a different beast than the mach64, not all mach64
have been marketed as 'Rage' and ATI recycled plenty of additional
letters, numbers, 'Pro's and so on thoughout the different chip families
( yes, ATI's model names are confusing and not entirely logical ) so -
sorry, there is no accelerated console driver for the Rage 128 as far as
I know. X should Just Work though.

have fun
Michael

--Signature_Mon__5_Dec_2005_18_50_41_-0500_GtWyqvpAEN63Y6PL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQ5TSUcpnzkX8Yg2nAQLZgQgArZfg6L3aWD2YpKhr/JW0wjUT1KVDDPw3
8zXHU5GRdnKWB4PLb1Td92DPRO49pEUnpQ8892OzhDDyutoV52QdO1vhB7jlAih6
ph0YAZbXXzgycC7/8Gp2ZIhQmrS3rvlVGEJP9YEDoGkqsKi8szL9jbaLPPtIqcP9
XIbXOwfgWea3Zimd9UfsS+xYtvk3/1j65CxLkm8h94KiTVOzhMulyGJJO9GqpbOf
iXoDElSCdA0hO4Ra/KQyTD9knC5xarkFqIeTU4uEUUyIDi/r83A2fN4Jw23bIdHZ
LY88jvwRXCja5+3Tn1fPRPd6km+FnCqR2mQN0awhWYf6mIkiSjdRsA==
=96fU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Mon__5_Dec_2005_18_50_41_-0500_GtWyqvpAEN63Y6PL--