>>IIRC i set them on both machines to 512MByte.
> 
> 
> Sounds like a good test.

and it runs (but: not macppc, as i wrote).

>  
> 
>>>That seems to be the
>>>cutoff on macppc, but it could be lower (but I've tried 300M and
>>>smaller with no problems).
>>
>>i'll test it with different configurations, 300MByte, 500MByte, 
>>600MByte, 750MByte e.g....?
> 
> 
> I'd probably try to binary tree it. 300M works in macppc, 600M doesn't.
> What does 450M do?

guess i'm able to test this tomorrow.

which version should i set up, an RCn or -current (if it's of any 
importance, that is ;)?

regards,

timo