Nate Hill <vugdeox@freeshell.org> wrote:

> This sounds interesting. Darwin may eventually be the emulee of 
> choice. Am I entirely wrong or does it seem that running the Darwin 
> JVM (or any proprietary binary-only package) would be magnitudes 
> easier than some "linux" binary package?

It depends what you call easy. Darwin userland is much less a mess than
Linux. On the other hand, COMPAT_DARWIN may look simple, but it also
require COMPAT_MACH and EXEC_MACHO, which are slightly more complicated
(just peek at sys/compat/mach ...) 

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent 
le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
manu@netbsd.org