Subject: Re: Is the kernel designed to return?
To: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
From: David A. Gatwood <dgatwood@gatwood.net>
List: port-macppc
Date: 01/15/2002 10:22:04
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> > NetBSD runs on a lot of machines. It doesn't technically "support" any
> > machines at all, beyond help on mailing lists. Mac OS X also runs on a
> > lot of machines, but it "supports" most G3 and G4 machines. A lot of
> > people run OS X on older machines. When things don't work, though, you're
> > pretty much on your own, beyond help on mailing lists. :-)
>
> I was under the impression that Mac OS X (or the software version of
> the Mac OS ROM?) was hamstrung such that it wouldn't run on (say)
> PowerComputing machines. Is that not true?
You have to recompile the kernel, IIRC, since there are drivers missing.
Otherwise, it should work, I think, with Unsupported UtilityX. Mac OS X
doesn't use the Mac OS ROM. Now I'm not saying classic will work, since
that does use the ROM file. No idea on that one.
> At any rate, my point was NetBSD will runs on more Apple hardware
> than Mac OS X does right now if you take a few moments to understand
> how to install it, while there is simply no way to run Mac OS X on
> (say) my old Performa 636. This, perhaps, is wheat better for
> netbsd-advocacy's mill, though. :^>
:-)
Later,
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my weekly web comic:
http://www.techmagazine.org