Subject: Re: tlp0 vs de0 again
To: Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
List: port-macppc
Date: 01/03/2002 04:54:09
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:38:01PM -0500, Todd Vierling wrote:
> Are there any built-in interfaces which *don't* work with `de'?

To the best of my knowledge, no. And switching the install kernel to
de sounds just swell by me. :^>

Is tlp not faster and more efficient, though? (Or is my memory
exactly backwards?)

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjw0KkEACgkQ9ehacAz5CRoCXgCgpj4ZO3nITjw8Gkc8faWRH4Hj
FKoAn308CVRgUbSAs2TKQnMuUyr9u4zr
=HBcZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--