On Tue, 17 May 2005, Hauke Fath wrote:

> But while it is bad that this PR doesn't get fixed, and the fix pulled up
> to netbsd-2-0[*] as well as netbsd-2 and netbsd-3, the fact that the error
> was in 2.0 in the first place shows that we, the users, didn't test
> properly. Which is just as bad.
>
[...]
>
> [*] Could some kind NetBSD developer please bump the priority of PR 29049
> to 'critical/high'? For it is...

 	Updated. Can someone please try a 2.0 sysinst and ensure that
 	the various options are set after selecting the partition layout
 	(mountpoint = /, install = yes, etc). Given the missing fstab
 	and newfs it sounds like sysinst is thinking that the partition
 	is not being used.

-- 
 		David/absolute       -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --