Kazuyuki Inanaga <happyday@pp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:52:42 +0900
> From: Kazuyuki Inanaga <happyday@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
> Subject: FPU-less '030 support
> To: Bruce ONeel <edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org>, port-mac68k@NetBSD.org
> content-length: 948
> 
> At 4:13 PM +0100 04.2.18, Bruce ONeel wrote:
> >
> >I'll try to add the SMALLRAM kernel to my build.  Would you
> >like me to do a 1.6.1 build of the SMALLRAM kernel or
> >would it be ok for me just to add this in the future?
> 
> Hi,
> Thank you very much for your mention about SMALLRAM kernel. I'm
> sorry that I've not tested your lc040-kernel on my fpu-less '030s yet.
> 
> I'll try to install your lc040-binary set to Macintosh LCIII+ without
> FPU in this weekend with pleasure :)
> Would you please tell me what shuld I test on it?

Hi,

It works if ls -l doesn't core dump :-)  top should also look
right as well.  Those are my two "smoke test" programs since 
ls -l uses floating point in printf for formatting and top
uses the math library.

> 
> About SMALLRAM, (is it made for Macintosh IIci?), I think we need
> to change some options for those fpu-less '030s.
> For example, my ClassicII and PB165 need 'se* SCSI ethernet' support.
> Duo 210 (and 230) needs netdock support.

Since I'm unfamiliar with this, maybe you could just send me
a kernel config file and I'll build that?  Let's call it something
other than SMALLRAM. That might be easiest.

> 
> About instkernel, there is same problem. If it didn't support those
> networking devices, the installation was not so happy.
> We need fpu-less '030's instkernel (in the future), too.

I think I see where to build these.  Could you send me a config
file like INSTALL or INSTALLSBC which I can build as well?

Thanks!

cheers

bruce

> 
> Thanks,
> Kazu Inanaga