on 6/30/03 5:47 PM, Allen Briggs at briggs@wasabisystems.com wrote:

> I think that this is the best solution.  I might even go so far as
> to say that we should have two MACHINE_ARCHs: m68k and m68knofp or
> something.  I don't think this would be a drop-in in the current
> world, though.  My concern is that it would be nice to have pre-built
> binary packages built both with and without FPU support.

as the owner of 2 fpu-less macs (an lc3 and an lc475) i think this could be
interesting. I did not know that since 1.6 fpu emu broke for '030s too.

Fixing the fpu emulation at least for 030 and "sane" lc040 would be good
too.

-ric