On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:26:58AM +0900, Takeshi Shibagaki wrote:
> First time is current-20010121, so maybe 1.28. Next time is maybe 1.27.
> I used a 1.5J INSTALL kernel which was made by me, when installed
> current-20010121.  Installation might be well because of an old kernel.

OK.  If the sources from 20010121 were used, it should have been 1.28.
If you still see problems with 1.28, please let me know.

> Is there a relation with NetBSD patition size or boot records(from 0
> to 576 sectors)? At first, 1.5Q install kernel(I made) failed because
> of no reading a patition table, when I was going to install. So, I
> formated by B's Crew(Formatter for Mac). At this time, boot records
> was changed.

Hmmm...  I don't think I understand your question.  There have been no
recent changes to the way that NetBSD reads partition tables.

-allen

-- 
 Allen Briggs                     briggs@wasabisystems.com
 http://www.wasabisystems.com/    Quality NetBSD CDs, Sales, Support, Service