Subject: Re: 640 x 400 displays
To: None <slumped@thekeyboard.com>
From: David A. Gatwood <dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 10/09/2000 12:03:23
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, David A. Gatwood wrote:
> > DAG> (Me and my friendship with non-square pixels....)
> >
> > You could have square pixels at any resolution, you would
> > just need to set the picture's aspect ratio appropriately.
>
> Sure. 640x400 is 16:10, so had widescreen tubes (16:9) been common back
> then, it would have fit pretty well. :-)
And of course, they did this on powerbooks.... Man, that's one
wide-looking screen on my 145....
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A brief Haiku:
Microsoft is bad.
It seems secure at first glance.
Then you read your mail.