Subject: Re: 512x384 displays
To: None <slumped@thekeyboard.com>
From: David A. Gatwood <dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 10/08/2000 21:52:13
On Sun, 8 Oct 100 slumped@thekeyboard.com wrote:
> Hello Emile!
>
> ES> But do not forget that you will have 16 colors (640 *
> > 480) instead of 256 (512 * 384) except if you have
> > 512 K of VRAM (then it is 256 colors instead of 32768)
>
> I'm guessing the stock LC has 256Kb of display memory, which
> is adequate for 640 x 400 in 256 colours on an appropriate
> monitor.
It's adequate for 640x480, but not at 256 colors. That requires exactly
300k. At best, if the hardware allowed it, you could get 6.8 bpp. So for
all practical purposes, 6 bpp, or 64 colors. Unfortunately, I think the
closest the hardware got to that was 4 bpp, which is 16 colors.
Interestingly enough, you could have gotten up to 512x512 in 256k, too....
Anyway.... (Me and my friendship with non-square pixels....)
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A brief Haiku:
Microsoft is bad.
It seems secure at first glance.
Then you read your mail.