Subject: Re: 512x384 displays
To: David A. Gatwood <dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org>
From: Emile Schwarz <emile.schwarz@wanadoo.fr>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 10/07/2000 20:14:38
By the way: I forgot to tell that it is possible to just connect a TV instead of
the Apple IIgs RGB analog monitor (same resolution and # of colors); just like
what I can do on my PowerMacintosh 8100/80 AV (eight years later)
Emile
"David A. Gatwood" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Dave Huang wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, David A. Gatwood wrote:
> > > Not a color display.... unless you're talking about the analog RGB display
> > > they used with the IIgs (which wo't work on Macs), which ran at... 320 x
> > > 480, I think? Something really bizarre.
> >
> > The 512x384 Mac question has been answered, but for those who are
> > interested in the trivia, the IIgs video maxed out at 640x200. Very
> > rectangular pixels in that mode :) 320x200 was also an option, as were
> > all of the pre-IIgs Apple II modes (560x192, 280x192, 80x48, 40x48).
>
> Okay. I knew it was a really small number in one direction. 200. That's
> right. 640x200 was one of the two SHR modes, and 320x200 was the other.
> Those analog displays... some weird resolutions because it didn't matter
> much -- fixed sync monitors, just using partial pixels to emulate
> different resolutions, IIRC. One thing about an analog waveform,
> resolution becomes a lot less complicated. :-)
>
> David
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> A brief Haiku:
>
> Microsoft is bad.
> It seems secure at first glance.
> Then you read your mail.