At 9:31 PM +0200 7/28/00, Hauke Fath wrote:
>
>-------------------------o
>| | | | | | |
>R R R R R R R
>| | | | | | |
>o o o o o o o
>
>
>-- whether by accident or design, I can't tell.
>I can imagine that taking one type for the other can give some interesting
>effects...

Oh, yes.  In this case the common pin is to a regulated voltage 
source and will in general use less power.  It may work better too, 
but it's still passive as opposed to the active types needed for 
faster SCSI chains.


Signature held pending an ISO 9000 compliant
signature design and approval process.
h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu