On Fri, 08 May 1998 10:23:20 -0700,
Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov> wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 1998 23:55:56 +0900 
>  Ken Nakata <kenn@synap.ne.jp> wrote:
> 
>  > "options UVM" is in std.mac68k, so unless you comment it out you'll
>  > get a kernel with UVM, I think.  Is there any ``clean'' way not to use
>  > UVM without modifying std.mac68k?
> 
> No... and if there is a problem, then you should fix the problem, not
> just build without UVM, because NetBSD 1.4 is _going_ to ship with UVM
> as the default on as many platforms as possible.

OK.  Well, I wasn't suggesting those who are having trouble with UVM
should build without it.  If I were, I wouldn't be working with Scott
and Chuck to resolve my UVM related panic ;-)

Ken