Subject: Re: ethernet problem...
To: None <cwood@ichips.intel.com>
From: Ken Nakata <kenn@echna.or.jp>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 04/08/1998 12:42:08
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 18:17:13 -0700 (PDT),
Colin Wood <cwood@ichips.intel.com> wrote:
> John Matney wrote:
> > 
> > etc/hosts
> > 
> > 	127.0.0.1 localhost localhost resnet.oberlin.edu
>                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> get rid of that!  you don't need anything other than localhost on the
> loopback interface

Hmm, the line above definitely looks fishy, as it repeats localhost
twice with a separate entry "resnet.oberlin.edu", but if it were
"localhost.resnet.oberlin.edu", there would be nothing wrong with the
line (Having it won't help any but won't hurt, either).  But either
way, I don't think it should cause any serious problem.

> > 	# my machine
> > 	132.162.225.78 RN1722 RN1722.resnet.oberlin.edu
> > 
> > etc/ifconfig.ae0
> > 
> > 	inet RN1722 netmask 255.255.0.0
> > 
> > etc/rc.conf
> > 
> > 	hostname="RN1722"
> > 	defaultroute="132.162.33.1"
> > 
> > etc/resov.conf
> > 
> > 	search oberlin.edu
> > 	nameserver 132.162.32.243
> 
> The rest looks fine as far as I can tell.

Should be OK, but netmask being 255.255.0.0 means the entire class-B
network is not divided into subnets.  That is rather unusual, I think.
But other than that, it looks OK, and there's nothing *technically*
wrong with using a non-subnetted class-B network.

> > I believe that this all I have to do according to the HOWTO. My ethernet
> > card is a Farallon EtherMac II (or something like that). NetBSD is giving
> > me the following error when it detects the card:
> > 
> > 	warning:ae0:reciever ring buffer overrun
> 
> This usually means that you're receiving packets faster than the machine
> can service them.  Are you on a busy ethernet?

He says "when it detects the card", so it looks similar to the problem
discussed in the FAQ:
http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/mac68k/faq/faq-10.html#ss10.16

Or perhaps:
http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/mac68k/faq/faq-10.html#ss10.15

(but does the kernel panic?)

Anyway, if it's just during bootstrap, I wouldn't worry too much.

> If the above note doesn't fix it, you got me....perhaps something is
> spewing at you on the local ethernet.

If his network really is not divided into multiple subnets, any
broadcast packet from any host on the network has to be received by
his Mac, and theoretically, there could be as many as 65534 hosts on
the network... ;-)

Ken