At 17:00 Uhr +0200 21.08.1997, Edward Seth Miller wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Aug 1997, Adrian Rollett wrote:
>> Quick question - Is it better to use the SBC or non-SBC kernel for a large
>> quantum drive? (large >= 1 gig)
>
>Well, somebody can correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like Quantum
>hasn't really changed their drive hardware all that much with time, and I
>KNOW that smaller Quantum drives GREATLY prefer the SBC kernel.

ncrscsi kernels used to corrupt a Q LPS 105S badly here and just run fine
with an Empire 1080 and a TRB 850 -- so there *are* differences.

	hauke


--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)