> On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > > There's probably a reason for that... I'd go as far as to say that Mach
> > > is a cool research OS (and, that's what it is; a research OS), but
> > > I'm hesitant to base production servers and workstations on it.
> > 
> > You may have good reason to be hesitant. I'm not sufficiently familiar
> > with Mach to know the issues. But because of Apple's support of the
> > MkLinux project, people ARE going to base "production" machines on
> > it (or at least try to).

Correct me if I'm wrong...  but doesn't Digital Unix (once known as OSF/1)
run atop an OSF Mk microkernel?

							Rob

--
<!--  Rob Pelkey <rpelkey@bates.edu> - http://www.bates.edu/~rpelkey/  -->
<!--  Professional Web Dude                 "God is dead" - Nietzsche  -->
<!--  Math Major, Bates College '98         "Nietzsche is dead" - God  -->