Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility

To: Nathanial Sloss <nathanialsloss%yahoo.com.au@localhost>
Subject: Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
From: John Klos <john%klos.com@localhost>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:05:54 +0000 (UTC)

Hi,

This is an intermediate step for a new arch where the flag can be set (say
m68klc).


Just curious:

How much of a performance impact is there from adding NOPs before floatingpoint instructions on systems with FPUs? Have you / has anyone measuredthis?

I've wondered about a binary patcher, or at least a patcher that patcheson binary load in to memory, like CyberPatcher / OxyPatcher for emulatedinstructions on '040 / '060 Amigas...


John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
  - From: Jason Thorpe

References:
- Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
  - From: Nathanial Sloss

Prev by Date: Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Next by Date: Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Previous by Thread: Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Next by Thread: Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index