Port-m68k archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)

To: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Subject: Re: Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 06:08:41 -0800


> On Jan 6, 2024, at 9:25 PM, Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> Yah, it’s certainly possible that none of the 68020 HPs support it.  318 and 319 were basically 320s, and the 350 was, IIRC, a 320 + an external cache.  330 had the PMMU, so maybe it worked differently?

My mistake — 318/319 were variations of the 330, not the 320.

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)
  - From: Herb Peyerl

References:
- Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui
- Re: Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)
  - From: Jason Thorpe

Prev by Date: Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user
Next by Date: Re: Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)
Previous by Thread: Re: Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)
Next by Thread: Re: Considering EOL of HP320/330/350 (Re: NetBSD/virt68k booting multi-user)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index