On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:28:17PM -0800, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
> this has turned far enough that it doesn't make sense to keep
> codesourcery/coldfire list in the loop, so I return discussion to
> port-m68k...
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:19:38PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > I don't understand the coldfire issue at all.
> > 
> > Maybe you should. I don't believe any of the above discussion is
> > relevant.  NetBSD doesn't even support ColdFire. Part of of my my
> > original proposal was that m68k and ColdFire are sufficiently
> > different that for practical purposes they're separate architectures.
> 
> some obvious questions: is there any interest for v4 coldfire support
> for NetBSD?  it is unreasonable to pursue a common 68k lowest-common-
> denominator ABI for NetBSD?

There are three different coldfire boards for Amiga announced, so...
yes, sort of.

	-is
-- 
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/