Subject: Re: Status of math_emulate
To: None <port-i386@netbsd.org>
From: Pierre Dubuc <pldubuc@yahoo.ca>
List: port-i386
Date: 02/25/2007 21:09:04
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Replying to message <6e9741c60702251724p611b5329p374ab28f9ea65ed1@mail.gmai...
>
> You may wish to try only defining one kind of CPU type (I386) instead
> of having I486 there; the fact that the kernel is detecting a 486DX
> and GENERIC has I486 defined might be tripping you up.
>
I rebuilt a kernel with just I386 (and MATH_EMULATE) defined. The probe
yields this interesting sequence now...
NetBSD 3.1 (I386) #0: Sun Feb 25 20:53:06 EST 2007
pldubuc@localhost.localhost:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/I386
total memory = 15616 KB
avail memory = 13164 KB
mainbus0 (root)
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: Intel 486DX (486-class)
NOTICE: this kernel does not support i486 CPU class
NOTICE: lowering CPU class to i386
...
The situation remains the same, though. Without an npx, the MATH_EMULATE
option is required, but the implementation of sqrt is flawed. Or rather,
by browsing math_emulate.c, it is altogether absent.
Does anyone think a PR is justified? I'm pretty sure the developers have
better things to do than supporting 15 year old hardware, but I'm new to
NetBSD, so I don't know how those things go.
- --
Pierre Dubuc
pldubuc@yahoo.ca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkXiQUoACgkQaMA1iJ2qYmJV9gCeOYVXr4Ma6iZMMdWo4j77lUBz
MJUAnRY30SLopPM4k+72wIAYMlsfLrqe
=dc3F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----