Subject: Re: Motherboard comments?
To: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 12/01/2006 06:59:21
--yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:37:14PM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 00:29:01 +0100 Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >
> > OK. I'm not sure the 82573 ethernet works fine with NetBSD, but I'm
> > not sure about the broadcom either.
>=20
> The 82573E and 82573L are listed in pcidevs, as is the Broadcom 5721,
> so they *should* work.  The question is whether or not they do....

FYI, being listed in pcidevs means nothing, really.  what counts is the
match table in the respective driver needs to include the reference to
the device.  (coincidentally, they are all listed there, this time)


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFFb8S5iwjDDlS8cmMRAmDnAJ46he58o7x+jKft3RCm8NcKTqLW7gCeOvPZ
PbzdmEWSyGU8TyHxR5YkhxU=
=dc3V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN--