Quoting Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>:

> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:32:02PM +1100, James Haggerty wrote:
> >
> > > >  but there was no performance improvement (using the
> > > > tst.c file). I guess this means DMA is still busted.
> > >
> > > How much speed does it report ?
> > >
> >
> > ~ 3mb/sec
>
> That's not much, I think you should get more.
> Maybe it's because the sc->sc_wdcdev.irqack was not set, please try the
> new patch.
> If it still doens't work, please use diff2, and check that the drive
> mode contains the 0x10 bit.
>

Still no improvement with diff1, diff2 reports 'Drive flags 0x51', so yes,
that bit is set.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.