Subject: Re: performance/scaleability of diskless setup
To: Joern Clausen <joern@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: port-i386
Date: 10/13/2005 23:44:56
--Signature_Thu__13_Oct_2005_23_44_56_-0400_APoLdhgj/ol2v4Ol
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

> Does anyone has any figures on performance of a mid-sized network of
> diskless clients? If I have 20-30 modern PCs (lots of RAM, local swap
> partition might be possible), is a single, equally modern PC
> sufficient as boot and file server (client roots, maybe swaps, shared
> /usr)? How many clients are possible/reasonable? Or is the potential
> bottleneck the network itself?

I have a 300MHz PowerPC box here ( running AIX ) which doesn't get
anywhere near breaking into sweat with 5 clients building NetBSD
releases at the same time entirely via NFS so I guess you won't even
need a modern PC to serve 20-30 diskless clients. As Jason said, your
best bet is probably a switch with a bunch of 100MBit ports for the
clients and a gigabit port for the server. Getting a good gigabit card
for the server will probably help more than spending the extra
bucks for a faster CPU.

have fun
Michael

--Signature_Thu__13_Oct_2005_23_44_56_-0400_APoLdhgj/ol2v4Ol
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQ08puMpnzkX8Yg2nAQJNJwgAg/9su2adxQPlXVNUWjtF8g7IJAjryRjO
B9Um23N10y/RJ7w0m5O8UFyBmZcOdwJmFNefckdBXm8+7EBkc8bWRF+LvXPA/Umh
zo6IxjJb33duBr6NuIedAzwBv3NFzH2SqKjY7i8yFftx4AwLugfr7bjMDseg3tjj
0q8/bxj5NGZT1yNRQPQy31T8W3ap9IVT+yu13kGwrXKpz/9vzPQtQ/AIGFCg5hw4
UOrbz7vheoBiC2xSswjpHn3+sm17ge7u5dURjRgOmS/pu4CZYvLi/anIdPKNwvIM
zHT3vKtthP2i52i9Mt0hUysNw8PHpdGfdrz/9fJrww3GzhmZfbVOZQ==
=nrcw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Thu__13_Oct_2005_23_44_56_-0400_APoLdhgj/ol2v4Ol--