The more I ponder the appearance of sys/arch/i386/stand/cdboot/cdboot.S,
the more confused I get.  Can somebody explain what advantages cdboot has
over a cd9660 bootloader built analogously to bootxx_ffsv1?  That is, why
don't we build an i386 ISO9660 bootloader by adding a trivial Makefile,
stand/bootxx/bootxx_cd9660/Makefile, like this one?

  # $NetBSD$

  FS=cd9660

  .include <../Makefile.bootxx>

Thoughts?

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933