On 7/15/05, Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>=20
> IPv6 should not be a problem, judging from what you presented, as you
> only have host-local (::1) and link-local addresses on your systems.
>=20
> To be really sure, one would have to see the routing table, which I
> think you didn't present.
>=20
> Regards,
>         -is
>=20

See below for the routing table as shown by 'route show'.

--=20
M. B. Trausch      http://fd0man.theunixplace.com/
678-522-7934        http://fd0man.livejournal.com/
fd0man@gmail.com      AIM/Yahoo:  MBTrausch/fd0man

-bash-3.00# route show
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination       Gateway            Flags
default           192.168.0.1        UG
10.0.0.0/24       link#2             U
loopback          127.0.0.1          UGR
localhost         127.0.0.1          UH
192.168.0.0/24    link#1             U
192.168.0.1       00:13:10:3c:63:5c  UH

Internet6:
Destination       Gateway            Flags
::/104            localhost          UGR
::/96             localhost          UGR
localhost         localhost          UH
::127.0.0.0       localhost          UGR
::224.0.0.0       localhost          UGR
::255.0.0.0       localhost          UGR
::ffff:0.0.0.0    localhost          UGR
2002::            localhost          UGR
2002:7f00::       localhost          UGR
2002:e000::       localhost          UGR
2002:ff00::       localhost          UGR
fe80::            localhost          UGR
fe80::%ex0        link#1             U
fe80::204:75ff:fee2:f76b%ex0 00:04:75:e2:f7:6b  UH
fe80::%tlp0       link#2             U
fe80::202:2aff:fecb:4198%tlp0 00:02:2a:cb:41:98  UH
fe80::%lo0        fe80::1%lo0        U
fe80::1%lo0       link#3             UH
fec0::            localhost          UGR
ff01::            localhost          U
ff02::%ex0        link#1             U
ff02::%tlp0       link#2             U
ff02::%lo0        localhost          U
-bash-3.00#