Subject: Re: KDE 3.4.0 binaries
To: Zafer Aydogan <zafer@gmx.org>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: port-i386
Date: 04/17/2005 12:59:35
--Signature_Sun__17_Apr_2005_12_59_35_-0400_cZZWmhMsqodu.WqH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

> I've recently built binary packages for KDE 3.4.0.
...
> But, in my opinion, I would prefer 3.3.2.
Hardly on topic but I definitely prefer 3.4 because prior versions had seri=
ously annoying (apparently 64bit-related because I didn't see them on macpp=
c and so on) bugs that made it a pain in the arse to use on a sparc64 box -=
 3.4 is much better. Still far from perfect but at least usable. It even se=
ems a little snappier than 3.3 but I guess that's hardly noticeable on toda=
y's x86 boxes ( on a 300MHz G3 it is though ).

have fun
Michael

--Signature_Sun__17_Apr_2005_12_59_35_-0400_cZZWmhMsqodu.WqH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQmKV98pnzkX8Yg2nAQKn5AgAnkxJXk+y0Zjugbbn4OZGGeIwJEjKvqTJ
o1vwIEHC3VcvLxiwDGZSb6S8R1ChgPOhP29VGD1Nn0OqgTr5qbJa2wMsJOOLdA7e
GeVsTb9CujKinLLjvFiqpE3WxVBGd/6Mt+9i48mHGDpJ/J1SMmWY7x901yk1ZE2u
h1H8rxToQs/4vzK3IJvpO5lrjlUc2Lbbksr0a1fYDhUicCZbxdhD/8jKO2AwEUiV
qfxMTisZISW6u8GUrluaPs52T89L5OqqoLhvC8GvFEpgOdzbMObIklxAljcsBeK8
lQqoikp+Rz3igX9Kw59kAxib1BDP5aAaJ1pxfl9G3jl/9LLK3YgjEw==
=OK+k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Sun__17_Apr_2005_12_59_35_-0400_cZZWmhMsqodu.WqH--