Subject: Re: NetBSD support for AMD PowerNow
To: None <email@example.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_V=E9giard?= <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/22/2005 21:54:43
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:36 +0100, RUMI Szabolcs <email@example.com> wrote:
>I have to apologize to all people who wanted to help me, or me to
>help them on PowerNow-related things but the laptop I was testing
>with didn't belong to me and it was taken away so that I do not have
>any testbed right now.
>The PowerNow patch from Martin Vegiard, including my modifications,
>is very far from perfect, I'd only call it a very preliminary support. If =
>does work on a certain laptop at all then it seems to work stable,
>I don't think it is really dangerous to use it, but if you'd ask me
>officially, I'd advise against using it on production systems.
I've been using my PowerNow patch daily, since NetBSD-2.0G.
I have used it with 2.0 and -current for quite some time.
Numerous people have confirmed the same with me.
Please note, that it is probably not the best idea to test PowerNow on
>It would be a lot better if someone who owns one or more PowerNow
>laptops or Cool'n'Quiet (=3DPowerNow for Opteron) systems could rewrite
>the whole thing from scratch. I appended some information I gathered
>to PR#26239 hoping that it might help with this.
For starters, PowerNow works with AMD K7 cpus (arch =3D=3D i386),
Cool'n'Quiet works with 64 bit AMD Athlon 64 bit cpus (arch =3D=3D amd64)
and those _two_ technologies don't work exactly the same way.
There is no reason to rewrite the whole thing from scratch :
- no one has encountered problems. (with non-broken bioses)
- no one has encountered instability/crashes.
My code is clean and conforms to AMD's specifications.=20
It has been committed to two serious BSD-type operating systems already.
For a list of known laptops (amd-k7) with broken bioses and an explanation =
The latest version of the PowerNow diff can be found at :
Thanks for your time