--Signature=_Wed__27_Oct_2004_09_12_43_+0200_bmxiWi7NGDyHmj9L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:58:50 +0200
Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.nopcode.org> wrote:

> 
> My system contains a VIA VT8235 southbridge, and it's working
> perfectly with NetBSD, but pcictl(8) detects a VT82C586A IDE controller:
> 
> [juan@Nocturno][~]> pcictl pci0 list|grep IDE
> 000:17:1: VIA Technologies VT82C586A IDE Controller [...]
> [juan@Nocturno][~]>
> 
> viaide0 at pci0 dev 17 function 1
> viaide0: VIA Technologies VT8235 ATA133 controller
> viaide0: bus-master DMA support present
> viaide0: primary channel configured to compatibility mode
> viaide0: primary channel interrupting at irq 14
> atabus0 at viaide0 channel 0
> viaide0: secondary channel configured to compatibility mode
> viaide0: secondary channel interrupting at irq 15
> atabus1 at viaide0 channel 1

Clearly pcictl(8) does not work as expected, because it always reports
the IDE controller is the VIA VT82C586A when it's wrong on my two
boxes.

http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/chipsets/southbridge/vt8235/

Should I fil a PR?

--Signature=_Wed__27_Oct_2004_09_12_43_+0200_bmxiWi7NGDyHmj9L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBf0prypkLYVDran0RAiayAJ9xwHUgdBiWEHR/d5gX8TuKSW/X5QCgwObG
2wmfjhZOt65V4x8SuTqBNM4=
=2ub/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Wed__27_Oct_2004_09_12_43_+0200_bmxiWi7NGDyHmj9L--