> > How could "working USB" not be an important goal for such a major
> > version bump?

> How does NetBSD 2.0 not have "working USB"? Works for me... you're
> seriously overstating the issue.

  Only because that's the impression it will make.  People will be
plugging their cameras and MP3 players in and think that "USB is broken in
this version".  Which is all I was meaning to say.  I guess I wasn't very
clear about it.


Magnus