Subject: Re: VLAN Configuration Problem
To: Ray Phillips <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Simas Mockevicius <email@example.com>
Date: 03/17/2004 11:22:40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:32:28PM +1000, Ray Phillips wrote:
> What's the appropriate combination of assigning an IP number(s) and=20
> subnet mask(s) to ex0 and vlan0 -- should both devices be given these=20
> values or just one, and should they be the different?
When I was configuring my system, I gave IP only to vlan interfaces.
> Should I have created two pseudo vlan devices or just one? At first=20
well, it is depends what do you want to do. One more question:
do you want to reach all mashines from any of them? Did you
configured "shared" port for boths vlans?
> I configured the switches "common" port to be tagged (in the switch's=20
> configuration nomenclature) for the VLAN test1 and untagged for=20
> test2. When I didn't succeed I selected "tagged" for both its VLANs=20
> and created another vlan pseudo device, but it didn't help.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----