--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 01:35:42PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <200402031256.i13Cu13p004853@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>,
> Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de> wrote:
> >Does port-i386 run on Opteron? How much bigger is amd64 code compared=20
> >to i386?=20
>=20
> Yes. I don't understand what is the meaning of bigger in this case. The
> kernel code or the userland code?

Both... hm, of course, kernel size isn't really a problem (assuming=20
cache sizes are reasonable), and we can run i386 binaries on
amd64 kernels, but I'd still like to know a rule of thumb...

Maybe I should have asked on port-amd64.

	-is

--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQB++yzCn4om+4LhpAQFNHQf/R48EEjC3R/mnwCv5ylJCtLTP7CPf9O3J
ftvvlbFLiLhACJF+kM2BYs2Iu6Q56fhnbF5OSfVDDPOFaXviBn04VzlrFaIz6fS9
Ox0tQJ7GKliTuIk05kJ7P0CMe6s2tksrfvpJn/Z6MLUWPt5oWIzYQvVi0N11DszO
ognoKeA/PYl4erdfzimla8Je6qkfFpzW8v3VEe/u1Cd9zYoNmG69Zc9rPHsukSHX
6CGj2BWfz7IJPcAx/gOizqXBYyZ7gWABiC4RWqomNisTDHb/h5qYuFLOoWtLRWbA
wYobyiQC7AFuzoJMyFT90zcrAxKKATzILbLaXPz19Q0YmEU9TCEHgQ==
=rugc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--