--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:50:07AM +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 01:46:07PM +0100, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
> > Sascha Wilde wrote:
> > > I'll give it a try, but afaik the card doesn't support pnp.  (The
> > > EtherExpess PRO/10 does, but I think NetBSD doesn
> > > t support PnP for that...).
> >=20
> > IIRC EtherExpress PRO/10 is not supported at all.=20
>=20
> Well, the EtherExpress PRO/10 _is_ supported by the iy driver.  But in
> fact, by digging some more in the mailinglist archive, I found out
> that there is a slight difference between the EtherExpress PRO/10 ISA
> Card and the EtherExpress PRO/10+ ISA card, from that I own the later,
> which is indeed not supported by the NetBSD iy driver...  :-(

>=20
> But it _is_ supported by the freebsd iy driver (I had the very same
> card up and running with that one) -- so someone more capable of
> driver hacking than me might want to have a look at it...

oh... then if I ever have some spare time, and remember, I'll have a look.
If it is indeed supposed to cover the same chip family.

Are you sure the "EtherExpress PRO/10" is the same as the "EtherExpress PRO=
"?
I am not. Can you name the chips are on the board, please?

Regards,
	-is



--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBP/qPezCn4om+4LhpAQE7oAf/YfqiwRJQ0iUN1CTYEx9uVCqX+QTgvzcH
+PLxsne8lSLrKuNjr5xaDQt4TPNdFPvcXtaaE3MzOVVx9ygNxcozmATdThk2xo5T
Qj00EE2ZukiUXjrjpZHOYlzUIEFuArxKwLSYy/fUjeO6mKcj3Ai6tilXXcQqXU0H
lrHkccwWmncqxdSLlbqg1eX2AT1WugRmyvkH3jfixvAhEA+dW9g7qFAJYmofDfIM
+Nu/YbxPAnUzkH5Ik6KaZAKahpqKXRJU9o+c0EFTeTmMALniT3ikNAKfuSsvF5jw
RfUUInPzCQm9JfnNoUDlm7av16cvQdwxwF5mgCEeVgPekf/GmkYeoQ==
=Shaq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--