Subject: Re: per-cpu TSS
To: Nathan J. Williams <nathanw@wasabisystems.com>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 11/15/2003 09:37:16
Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> "It should be done in some form or another? Is that true? Why should
> it be done at all?

"Why would anyone need more than 640KB of memory?"

Jaromir

> Sure, it's conceptually bad to be limited to a
> fixed number of LWPs, but is it a practical problem? What we're seeing
> in this discussion is that there are side effects to the change beyond
> simply removing a cap, and so we have to consider whether it's a cap
> that is actually causing trouble.
> 
>         - Nathan
> 

-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.cz/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the Buddhist -=-
-=- masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you        -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow.   Do not let this distract you.''   -=-