> OK, I'll take a shot at this... I re-built /usr/mdec/boot with both the 1.2 
> and 1.3 revisions of getextmemx.c, with no difference in behavior, so what 
> I think I hear you saying is that maybe it is the boot_xxffsv1 code I 
> should look at, since it "appears" first... is this correct?  What would be 
> another candidate to look at?

I've updated src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosmemx.S and getextmemx.c
(the latter just adjusts when a diag print is done)

It is possible that this fixes memory detection on some systems, you
may even have such a machine!

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk